Advisory Working Group Members
Virginia Valentine - Chair - Nevada Resort Association
Harshal Desai - Vice Chair - Atlas
David Bobzien - Gov Office - Energy
Doug Busselman - Nevada Farm Bureau Federation
Julie Butler - Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles
Cindy Creighton - NV Taxpayers Association
Bradley Crowell - NV Department of Conservation & Natural Resources
Kyle Davis - Pinyon Public Affairs
Sherry Ely-Mendes - Pyramid Paiute Tribe
Paul Enos - NV Trucking Association
Jayce Farmer - UNLV Public Policy
Carlos Gomez - Latin Chamber of Commerce
Vinson Guthreau - NACO
Dallas Harris - NV Senate Chair, Growth & Infrastructure
Lamare Jones - IBEW
Craig Madole - AGC - NV Chapter North
Lucia Maloney - CAMPO
MJ Maynard - Regional Transportation Commission - Southern Nevada
Daniele Monroe-Moreno - NV Assembly Chair, Growth & Infrastructure
Paul Moradkhan - Vegas Chamber
Joey Paskey - City of Las Vegas
Julie Regan - Tahoe Regional Planning
Kris Sanchez - GOED
Ann Silver - Reno/Sparks Chamber
Marie Steele - NV Energy
Kristina Swallow - Director - Nevada Department of Transportation
Kathleen Taylor - NV Women’s Business Center
Bill Thomas - Regional Transportation Commission of Washoe County
Bill Wellman - Las Vegas Paving
Role of AWG Members
Important policies for how the AWG will conduct its work are found in the AWG Operating Procedures.
The Advisory Working Group has three primary responsibilities: (1) participate in deliberations in an open, constructive manner to help the Group arrive at findings, conclusions, and recommendations; (2) provide relevant information and perspectives to help improve the research and broader understanding; and (3) actively and accurately share information with others. Operating Procedures will help ensure the Group remains in alignment with these responsibilities and the overall mission of the study.
Key provisions include:
Appointed ("seated") AWG members or, if the seated member is absent, their designated alternates can participate in discussions, speak for their organization or sector, vote, etc. Others wishing to express an opinion or share information are invited to do so during the public comment period or in writing to be shared with the full AWG.
Organizations who are not seated AWG members and the general public will be invited to offer any comments during a public comment period to be held each meeting.
Smaller groups of the AWG may need to be convened from time to time to conduct more detailed research and analysis on specific issues. All results from these smaller, ad hoc groups will be brought forth to the full AWG for consideration.
The AWG will operate by consensus. The goal will be to reach unanimous consensus – meaning that all members support, or can live with, the AWG recommendations. If unanimous consensus cannot be reached on findings, conclusions, or recommendations, the majority opinion as determined by members entitled to vote will be conveyed as the AWG recommendations, with any differences of opinion noted and included as part of the AWG’s final report.
An "issues registry" will be used to keep track of relevant questions or issues that need further exploration and consideration between meetings or at future meetings.
AWG members are asked to let the process reach its conclusion before describing potential strategies or concepts as AWG "recommendations".